A Sustainable Lovelihood

Love making is perhaps one of the most pleasant, sensual activity invented by man. This love can be in any form transcending the familial relationship. Mother -child love is considered the most pious, selfless, untendered. Here, I try to bring out various facets of romantic love ❤ developed between young boys and girls. We in our formative age develop love consciousness, our preferences, likes and dislikes for wannable partners. All these things are shaped by peer learnings which we get from movies, nearby romantic couples or some fiction or real life stories. In most of the cases love  making conditionings are quite glamorous or if not it's made by literary fantasy. So we grow seeing /listening/reading such ideal love conditions. Even poignant love circumstances are put in such a way that we want to be  these protagonists because ending is mostly very pleasantly satisficing as movies like DIL, TITANIC, KYAMAT SE KYAMAT TAK, or fictions like 'I too had love story'  or some cases of honour killings etc. All such fictious or  real instances raise the question of nature of love making. Do girls like only prince in her dream or they just fall in love and make that individual prince? Or ,do they search prince firstly and then make love? Off course  same questions hold for boys too. My observation so far  is that love is mostly depicted very piously where anyone can be prince or queen of the special one. Here, bringing the Marxian materialism will be unwarranted. A Rajkumar can be king 👑 of non-material part with his good heart, high moral, integrity, loyalty,sincerity like values. Now, perhaps glamorisation/materialization of everything  has blinded people which we see in the form of  exchange of highly priced gift, fat wedding, dowry. Girls measure  boys' depth of pocket and boys measure the quantum of fortune girls can bring with them. In this context, yes, Marxists' observations are still relevant. There is increasing capitalist call in which true love is being pissed and every move has become victim of filthy materialism. But, I also do recognise the very idea of love can not  be lived only in vacuum or by cooking words, it must be manifested by sprinkling colours in it in the form of including material aspects as one look for exotic honeymoon destination but again extravaganza, conspicuosness should not mar the idea of middle path guided by Buddhist economics as espoused by Schumacher in his "SMALL IS BEAUTIFUL"....